Stone tool type
Chopper
Also called Cobble Chopper, Pebble Chopper, Pebble Tool, Flake Chopper, Spall Chopper
ChopperAll periods (Boen and Williams 2022). Examples: a cobble chopper inside the skull of an extinct bison at the Bayrock kill site, Alberta, which also yielded an Alberta point (Alberta complex about 9,500–9,000 B.P.; Peck 2011); 2,420–2,270 B.P. at the Pipeline site, Texas (Quigg et al. 2010); about 1,150 B.P. in an Old Women's phase camp in Alberta (Peck 2011).Late Paleoindian to Late PrehistoricKey facts
- Age
- All periods (Boen and Williams 2022). Examples: a cobble chopper inside the skull of an extinct bison at the Bayrock kill site, Alberta, which also yielded an Alberta point (Alberta complex about 9,500–9,000 B.P.; Peck 2011); 2,420–2,270 B.P. at the Pipeline site, Texas (Quigg et al. 2010); about 1,150 B.P. in an Old Women's phase camp in Alberta (Peck 2011).
- Cultural period
- Late Paleoindian to Late Prehistoric
- Material
- Quartzite and chert cobbles or nodules most often; also limestone and other tough local stone (Bell 1980; Peck 2011; Quigg et al. 2010; Boen and Williams 2022).
More from the Paleo, Late Prehistoric periods
Description
A chopper is a heavy, hand-sized cobble, pebble or thick spall with one sharp, usually convex working edge made by removing a few large flakes; the rest keeps its natural rind (cortex). Unifacial choppers are flaked from one face only, which gives a steep edge; bifacial choppers have flakes taken from both faces along the edge (Bell 1980; Peck 2011). The outline follows the original cobble, so shapes vary widely.
Choppers were made by direct percussion on a stream cobble or chert nodule, with little further shaping (Holmes 1919). Tough stone was favored, above all quartzite and cobble chert (Bell 1980; Quigg et al. 2010; Boen and Williams 2022). They were held in the hand rather than hafted (Bell 1980), often by a flat, unworked cortex end (Quigg et al. 2010).
Used edges show crushing, rounding, small hinge scars and sometimes polish. Archaeologists interpret choppers as tools for hacking meat and wood (Bell 1980) and for breaking bones for marrow (Peck 2011; Boen and Williams 2022). At the Pipeline site in the Texas Panhandle, use-wear study found wood fragments and silica polish on one chopper's edge and cooked wild-rye starch on another, used to pound seeds (Quigg et al. 2010). The key trait is a single flaked edge on an otherwise unworked, cortex-covered cobble.
Size
Length mostly 50–120 mm (Bell 1980, Oklahoma). Five Late Archaic choppers from the Pipeline site, Texas: length 77–186 mm, weight 245–850 g (Quigg et al. 2010).
Distribution
Found across North America wherever cobbles were at hand; reported, for example, throughout Oklahoma (Bell 1980), on the northern Plains of South Dakota and Alberta (Boen and Williams 2022; Peck 2011) and in the Texas Panhandle (Quigg et al. 2010). Bell (1980) found them most frequent on Archaic sites.
Additional information
Identification tips: Look for cortex over most of the stone and one edge formed by a few large percussion scars, with crushing or polish from use. A cobble with one or two flakes knocked off and no edge wear is more likely a tested cobble from a quarry or gravel bar (Bell 1980).
Similar types: Hammerstone is battered along its edges but lacks a flaked cutting edge (Boen and Williams 2022). Chipped stone axes are notched or waisted for a handle (Bell 1980; Boen and Williams 2022). Adze has a unifacially bevelled bit (Connaway 1977).
Naming: Bell (1980) links the term to the pebble tools of the Old World Paleolithic and warns that a crude look does not mean great age. In the Lower Mississippi Valley, "chopper" has also named small, ovate chipped bifaces 41–79 mm long (n = 174, Denton site, Middle Archaic) and Baytown-period pebble tools once called Deasonville choppers (Connaway 1977). In the Northeast, Early Archaic "choppers" of soft sandstone, siltstone and phyllite are now often called tabular knives (Robinson and Crock 2006).
Dating evidence: In Alberta, choppers become more common in Bracken phase assemblages (about 2,800–2,100 B.P.), when mass bison kills began (Peck 2011).
Similar types
Types that are easy to confuse with the Chopper stone tool.
Sources
- Bell, Robert E. 1980. Oklahoma Indian Artifacts. Contributions from the Stovall Museum No. 4. University of Oklahoma, Norman.samnoblemuseum.ou.edu (opens in a new tab)
- Boen, Renee M., and Roger R. Williams. 2022. Identifying Chipped and Ground Stone Artifacts Found in South Dakota and Adjacent Regions. Cultural Material Series No. 2. Archaeological Research Center, South Dakota State Historical Society, Rapid City.history.sd.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Peck, Trevor R. 2011. Light from Ancient Campfires: Archaeological Evidence for Native Lifeways on the Northern Plains. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton.aupress.ca (opens in a new tab)
- Quigg, J. Michael, Charles D. Frederick, Paul M. Matchen, and Kendra G. DuBois. 2010. Landis Property: Data Recovery at Three Prehistoric Sites (41PT185, 41PT186, and 41PT245) in Potter County, Texas, Vol. 1. TRC Report No. 150832. TRC Environmental Corporation, Austin, for the Bureau of Land Management, Amarillo.texasbeyondhistory.net (opens in a new tab)
- Holmes, William H. 1919. Handbook of Aboriginal American Antiquities, Part 1: The Lithic Industries. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 60. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Connaway, John M. 1977. The Denton Site: A Middle Archaic Occupation in the Northern Yazoo Basin, Mississippi. Archaeological Report No. 4. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.mdah.ms.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Robinson, Francis W., IV, and John G. Crock. 2006. From Choppers to Tabular Knives: The Morphologies, Functions and Implications of an Early Holocene Tool Class. Journal of Vermont Archaeology 7. Vermont Archaeological Society.vtarchaeology.org (opens in a new tab)