Stone tool type
End Scraper
Also called Thumb scraper, Thumbnail scraper
End ScraperAbout 13,000 years ago to the 1700s A.D.: present in Clovis toolkits (Pollack 2008); still made on 18th-century Spanish mission sites in Texas (Texas Beyond History)Paleoindian to HistoricKey facts
- Age
- About 13,000 years ago to the 1700s A.D.: present in Clovis toolkits (Pollack 2008); still made on 18th-century Spanish mission sites in Texas (Texas Beyond History)
- Cultural period
- Paleoindian to Historic
- Material
- Fine-grained chert and other flint-like stone, often heat-treated; metavolcanic rock in the Carolina Piedmont.
Description
An end scraper is a small flake tool with a steep, rounded working edge (the bit) at one end. Most are made on medium to large flakes, often slightly curved in side view, and are trimmed to a triangular, rectangular or rounded outline; some writers call them thumb scrapers. The underside is usually the flat, unflaked face of the original flake (Bell 1980; Morrow 2016).
The bit was made by striking a row of short flakes from one face, usually at the end opposite the striking platform, which leaves a thick, steep edge that resists breaking. The sides were often trimmed and the butt thinned so the tool would sit in a handle, such as an L-shaped piece of elk antler on the northern Plains. Fine-grained and heat-treated cherts were preferred (Morrow 2016).
Use-wear studies and ethnographic accounts show that most were used to scrape and soften hides; some also worked wood, bone or antler. Each resharpening removes about 1 mm, so heavily used scrapers become short and stubby, and the bit edge can be visibly rounded and dulled (Morrow 2016). The key trait is a steep, convex scraping edge retouched from one face across the end of a flake.
Size
Length 17.0–42.2 mm (complete specimens, n = 17); width 13.0–29.0 mm (mean 20.3 mm, n = 27); maximum thickness 4.3–12.9 mm (mean 7.6 mm, n = 10); bit angle mean 64 degrees (Brink 1978, Smoky site, west-central Alberta). Late Paleoindian to Early Archaic end scrapers from the Hardaway site, North Carolina, are larger: length 24.7–63.9 mm (mean 44.7 mm), width 19.2–45.1 mm (mean 31.3 mm), thickness 5.9–20.0 mm (mean 9.9 mm) (n = 26, UNC Research Laboratories of Archaeology catalog). Bell (1980) gives 20–60 mm as the usual length of Oklahoma scrapers.
Distribution
Found across North America. Especially plentiful on the Plains and in Texas at sites where bison were hunted and hides processed (Bell 1980; Texas Beyond History).
Additional information
Identification tips: Look for a flat underside, a steep edge chipped from the top face only at one end, and trimmed sides that taper toward the butt. Smoothing or rounding along the bit is wear from use.
Similar types: Side Scraper has its working edge along a long side, not the end. Spurred End Scraper is an end scraper with one or two small, sharp projections at the corners of the bit. Edgefield Scraper is a named Early Archaic hafted scraper with a notched base. Hafted end scrapers reworked from broken points keep the point's stem or notches and can be dated by that point type (Morrow 2016). Gunflints are square to rectangular, about 25 by 30 mm, and came with European firearms (Boen and Williams 2022).
Naming: Also written endscraper; also called thumb scraper (Brink 1978; Morrow 2016). Bell (1980) describes the classic form as spoon-shaped.
Dating evidence: Common in Paleoindian assemblages. In Kentucky, hafted end scrapers made from reworked points are common on Middle and Late Archaic sites, and bone beamers largely replaced chipped scrapers for hide work in the Early Woodland (Pollack 2008). In Texas, small end scrapers mark Late Prehistoric Toyah bison-hunting sites.
Similar types
Types that are easy to confuse with the End Scraper stone tool.
Sources
- Morrow, Toby A. 2016. Stone Tools of Minnesota. Wapsi Valley Archaeology, Anamosa, Iowa, for the Minnesota Statewide Survey of Historical and Archaeological Sites. Chapter 4, Chipped Stone Tools: End Scrapers.mn.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Bell, Robert E. 1980. Oklahoma Indian Artifacts. Contributions from the Stovall Museum No. 4. University of Oklahoma, Norman. Flint Scrapers section.samnoblemuseum.ou.edu (opens in a new tab)
- Texas Beyond History. 2001. Stone Tools of Texas Indians: tool gallery, Late Prehistoric End Scrapers; End Scrapers from Spanish Missions. Texas Archeological Research Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin.texasbeyondhistory.net (opens in a new tab)
- Pollack, David (editor). 2008. The Archaeology of Kentucky: An Update, Volume One. State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort. Paleoindian, Archaic and Woodland chapters.heritage.ky.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Research Laboratories of Archaeology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2026. End Scraper and Side Scraper catalog records with 3D models, Hardaway site (31St4), Stanly County, North Carolina (North Carolina Archaeological Collection). Zenodo (e.g., records 21529917, 21370054, 21565895).zenodo.org (opens in a new tab)
- Brink, John W. 1978. An Experimental Study of Microwear Formation on Endscrapers. M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta, Edmonton; published 1978 by the National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Boen, Renee M., and Roger R. Williams. 2022. Identifying Chipped and Ground Stone Artifacts Found in South Dakota and Adjacent Regions. South Dakota State Historical Society, Archaeological Research Center, Rapid City.history.sd.gov (opens in a new tab)