Other artifact type
Bone Fishhook
Also called One-Piece Bone Hook
Bone FishhookGreen River Archaic, about 4000–1000 B.C. (Henderson and Burdin 2006); about 2,000 years ago at Lt-11, Oklahoma (Bell 1980); Late Prehistoric Fort Ancient (Slone site, Kentucky; Henderson 2008) and Washita River focus villages (Bell 1980).Late Archaic to ProtohistoricKey facts
- Age
- Green River Archaic, about 4000–1000 B.C. (Henderson and Burdin 2006); about 2,000 years ago at Lt-11, Oklahoma (Bell 1980); Late Prehistoric Fort Ancient (Slone site, Kentucky; Henderson 2008) and Washita River focus villages (Bell 1980).
- Cultural period
- Late Archaic to Protohistoric
- Culture
- Green River Archaic; Washita River focus; Fort Ancient; Mandan
- Material
- Mammal and bird bone (Bell 1980); composite hooks on the Pacific coast set bone spikes on wooden or whalebone shanks (Hodge 1907).
More from the Archaic period
Description
A bone fishhook is a hook cut and ground in one piece from bone, usually without a barb, with the top of the shank grooved or knobbed to hold the line. The bend is the weak point and is often left thicker than the shank, and broken hooks outnumber whole ones (Bell 1980).
At the McLaughlin-McCutchen site (Lt-11), Latimer County, Oklahoma, a flat rectangular bone blank was ground through in the middle from both faces to make an oval hole, then cut on either side so that one blank gave two hooks, finished by scraping and abrading; small hooks were apparently made from bird bone the same way (Bell 1980). At the Baum village, Ohio, bones were split and ground thin to a narrow rim, then cut near each end, giving two hooks per split bone; finishing rounded the base, sharpened the point, widened the gap and notched the shank (Moorehead 1910, after Mills).
Green River Archaic shell middens in Kentucky hold many bone fishhooks, probably used on plant-fiber lines for drum, catfish and softshell turtles (Henderson and Burdin 2006). The key trait is a one-piece bone hook with a grooved or knobbed shank and usually no barb.
Size
Two size groups in Oklahoma: small hooks about 20 mm long or less, and large hooks about 45 mm long (Bell 1980; sample size not given).
Distribution
Kentucky shell middens, Ohio mounds and villages, Plains villages (Mandan, North Dakota) and Oklahoma, where they are rare; also the Pacific coast and the Arctic, where composite hooks are common (Hodge 1907; Moorehead 1910; Bell 1980; Henderson and Burdin 2006).
Additional information
Look for a curved one-piece hook with a shaped line attachment at the top of the shank, and for flat preforms with a ground central hole, which show where hooks were made (Bell 1980; Moorehead 1910). A gorge is straight and pointed at both ends, with no bend (Hodge 1907). Great Lakes copper fishhooks are bent from metal rod. Chipped flint fishhooks have been a popular fake since about 1890, and Bell (1980) knew of none from an excavation. Shell fishhooks are a Pacific-coast form, absent in Oklahoma (Bell 1980). Hooks in every stage of manufacture are known from Lt-11, the Baum village and a Mandan village (Bell 1980; Moorehead 1910).
Similar types
Types that are easy to confuse with the Bone Fishhook artifact.
Sources
- Bell, Robert E. 1980. Oklahoma Indian Artifacts. Contributions from the Stovall Museum No. 4. University of Oklahoma, Norman. Bone Fishhooks, pp. 66-67.samnoblemuseum.ou.edu (opens in a new tab)
- Moorehead, Warren K. 1910. The Stone Age in North America, Vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin, Boston and New York. Objects of Bone.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Hodge, Frederick W. (editor). 1907. Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, Part 1. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 30. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. (Entry Fishhooks.)archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Henderson, A. Gwynn, and Rachel Burdin. 2006. Hunters and Gatherers of the Green River Valley. Kentucky Archaeological Survey Education Series No. 7. Kentucky Heritage Council and University of Kentucky, Lexington.kentuckyarchaeologicalsurvey.org (opens in a new tab)
- Henderson, A. Gwynn. 2008. Fort Ancient Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: An Update, Vol. 2, edited by David Pollack, pp. 739-902. State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort.