Other artifact type

Bone Awl

Also called Bone Perforator, Bone Punch, Deer Bone Awl

Bone AwlAll prehistoric periods (Hodge 1907; Bell 1980). Deer ulna awls are a diagnostic Archaic trait (Ford and Willey 1941, cited in Jefferies 2008); common in Green River Archaic shell middens, about 4000–1000 B.C. (Henderson and Burdin 2006); present on Fort Ancient sites, about A.D. 1000–1750 (Henderson 2008).Archaic to Protohistoric

Key facts

Age
All prehistoric periods (Hodge 1907; Bell 1980). Deer ulna awls are a diagnostic Archaic trait (Ford and Willey 1941, cited in Jefferies 2008); common in Green River Archaic shell middens, about 4000–1000 B.C. (Henderson and Burdin 2006); present on Fort Ancient sites, about A.D. 1000–1750 (Henderson 2008).
Cultural period
Archaic to Protohistoric
Culture
Green River Archaic (Kentucky); Hopewell (Harness Mound, Ohio); Washita River focus (Oklahoma); Fort Ancient
Material
Deer bone above all (ulna, metapodial, fibula and other long bones); also bear, wild turkey (tarsometatarsus), bison rib and vertebral spine, other bird bone and antler; walrus, narwhal and fossil ivory in the Arctic (Hodge 1907; Moorehead 1910; Bell 1980; Illinois State Museum).

More from the Archaic period

Description

A bone awl is a pencil-like piece of bone tapered at one end to a point. The butt is often the unmodified joint end of the bone, left as a handle, or is shaped for a grip. Some are sturdy, with strong tips for heavy work; others are drawn out to fine, needle-like points (Bell 1980; Hodge 1907).

The simplest awls were made by grinding a long bone or a bone splinter to a point; a deer fibula needs only sharpening (Hodge 1907). On Washita River focus sites in Oklahoma, a deer cannon bone (metapodial) was grooved lengthwise on both faces and snapped, then each half was grooved and snapped again, so one bone gave four awls with the joint left as a handle; pieces occur at every stage (Bell 1980). Grooved abraders were used to sharpen the points (Bell 1980). Awls punched holes for sewing skins and served in quillwork, beadwork and basketry; Hodge (1907) lists further uses such as pegs and sinew shredding. Handling and use build up a heavy polish (Bell 1980). Bone awls were usually held in the hand rather than hafted (Hodge 1907). The key trait is a bone shaft deliberately ground to a sharp, polished point.

Size

Length mostly 75–150 mm, though shorter and longer awls are fairly common (Bell 1980, Oklahoma collections; sample size not given).

Distribution

Throughout North America (Hodge 1907). Awls are the most common bone object on village sites after beads: Ozark caves yielded more than 100 in three seasons, and Kelley Cavern, Arkansas, over 50 (Moorehead 1910). Turkey-bone awls are especially common in New Mexico (Hodge 1907).

Additional information

Look for deliberate shaping at the tip and use polish. A bone pressure flaker has a blunted, crushed tip instead of a sharp polished point (Bell 1980). A beamer is a cannon bone with a slot worn through the shaft and bevelled concave edges; an unfinished split-bone awl blank lacks the beamer's concave outline, bevel and polish (Bell 1980). A bone needle has an eye. Long slender bone pins with decorated or widened heads are hair or garment pins (Moorehead 1910). On Oklahoma Plains Village sites, short rib-edge awls of bison bone, triangular in section with spongy bone along one side, were probably hafted (Bell 1980). Hodge (1907) warns that weaving tools, pottery tools, robe pins and pipe picks have often been lumped with awls.

Similar types

Types that are easy to confuse with the Bone Awl artifact.

Sources

  1. Bell, Robert E. 1980. Oklahoma Indian Artifacts. Contributions from the Stovall Museum No. 4. University of Oklahoma, Norman. Bone Awls, pp. 61-65.samnoblemuseum.ou.edu (opens in a new tab)
  2. Hodge, Frederick W. (editor). 1907. Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, Part 1. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 30. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. (Entries Awls and Bone-work.)archive.org (opens in a new tab)
  3. Moorehead, Warren K. 1910. The Stone Age in North America, Vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin, Boston and New York. Objects of Bone.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
  4. Illinois State Museum. 2017. Raw Materials and Technology. Archaic Period zooarchaeology exhibit. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.zooarch.illinoisstatemuseum.org (opens in a new tab)
  5. Jefferies, Richard W. 2008. The Archaic Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: An Update, Vol. 1, edited by David Pollack, pp. 193-337. State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort.archaeology.ky.gov (opens in a new tab)
  6. Henderson, A. Gwynn, and Rachel Burdin. 2006. Hunters and Gatherers of the Green River Valley. Kentucky Archaeological Survey Education Series No. 7. Kentucky Heritage Council and University of Kentucky, Lexington.kentuckyarchaeologicalsurvey.org (opens in a new tab)
  7. Henderson, A. Gwynn. 2008. Fort Ancient Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: An Update, Vol. 2, edited by David Pollack, pp. 739-902. State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort.

Back to all 1,069 types