Other artifact type
Bannerstone
Also called Atlatl Weight, Butterfly Stone, Winged Stone
BannerstoneAbout 6000–1000 B.C., roughly 8,000–3,000 years ago (Blume 2025); polished atlatl weights first appear in the Middle Archaic, about 6000 B.C. in southern Indiana (USDA Forest Service); Green River shell middens with atlatl weights in Kentucky date about 4650–1450 cal B.C. (Jefferies 2008).Middle Archaic to Late ArchaicKey facts
- Age
- About 6000–1000 B.C., roughly 8,000–3,000 years ago (Blume 2025); polished atlatl weights first appear in the Middle Archaic, about 6000 B.C. in southern Indiana (USDA Forest Service); Green River shell middens with atlatl weights in Kentucky date about 4650–1450 cal B.C. (Jefferies 2008).
- Cultural period
- Middle Archaic to Late Archaic
- Culture
- Shell Mound Archaic (Green River, Kentucky); Savannah River Archaic; Poverty Point
- Material
- Banded slate, porphyry, granite, quartz and quartzite, greenstone, diorite, gabbro, serpentinite and other fine-grained igneous and metamorphic stone; rarely shell in Florida.
More from the Archaic period
Description
A bannerstone is a ground and polished stone, usually palm-sized, with one large hole bored lengthwise through a thickened center (the midrib or spine) and a balanced wing or lobe on each side. Knoblock (1939) sorted them into 24 named forms, among them butterfly (single- and double-notched), hourglass, reel, bottle, geniculate, ovate, pick, crescent, double crescent, saddle-face and fluted ball.
Makers pecked a block of stone to shape with a hammerstone, ground it on gritty stone, and bored the central hole, often with a hollow tube such as cane fed with sand and water. Partly bored pieces keep a raised core inside a ring-shaped groove (Hodge 1907; Beauchamp 1897). Favored stones are colorful and fine grained: banded slate, porphyry, granite, quartz, quartzite, greenstone and other igneous and metamorphic rocks.
Most archaeologists interpret bannerstones as weights or counterbalances on the shaft of an atlatl (spear-thrower), a reading drawn from Archaic shell-midden burials in Kentucky that held stone weights together with atlatl hooks (Jefferies 2008). Experiments have not shown that a weight adds much force, and very large or fragile examples are read as ceremonial; many were broken or split along the spine before being cached or placed in graves (Blume 2025). The key trait is a single large, carefully bored hole running through a thickened midrib between two symmetrical wings.
Size
Most fit in the palm of a hand; weight about 46–500 g (Blume 2025). Metropolitan Museum examples: double-notched butterfly 59 × 89 × 28 mm (banded slate); others 76 × 121 mm and 152 × 127 mm. A New York butterfly is 111 mm wide and 70 mm high with a bore about 16 mm across (Beauchamp 1897, converted from inches).
Distribution
Eastern North America, from the Great Lakes and southern Ontario to the Florida Panhandle and from the Mississippi Valley to the Atlantic coast; Knoblock placed the heartland around the junction of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers (Blume 2025). The Savannah River valley of Georgia and South Carolina was a production center, and finished and unfinished pieces were carried south into Florida (Archaeology 2017; Blume 2025).
Additional information
Look for one large hole bored through the length of the midrib. A hole drilled across a thin flat plate points to a gorget or pendant; boatstones are hollowed underneath with two small end holes; birdstones and bar amulets have angled holes drilled into the base at each end (Beauchamp 1897). Reel bannerstones resemble reel-shaped gorgets, but the gorgets are thin plates with two small holes through the face (Mills 1916). Abbott coined the name in the 1870s, guessing they were carried on staffs like banners; Hodge (1907) notes "butterfly stones" for the winged variety. Knoblock's (1939) form names remain the standard terms and are used by the FIT Bannerstone Project. Many pieces in collections lack context; dated examples come from Archaic shell middens, burials and caches such as Indian Knoll, Kentucky, and from Poverty Point, Louisiana (Jefferies 2008; Blume 2025).
Identified by
- Named by
- Byron W. Knoblock (form typology)
- Year
- 1939
Similar types
Types that are easy to confuse with the Bannerstone artifact.
Sources
- Blume, Anna. 2025. On the Multiple Lives of Bannerstones: Indigenous North America 6,000 BCE to the Present. MAVCOR Journal 9(1). Yale University.mavcor.yale.edu (opens in a new tab)
- Archaeology (Archaeological Institute of America). 2017. Set in Stone. Archaeology, July/August 2017.archaeology.org (opens in a new tab)
- FIT Bannerstone Project. n.d. Typology (24 bannerstone types after Knoblock 1939) and item tags. Fashion Institute of Technology, State University of New York.bannerstone.fitnyc.edu (opens in a new tab)
- Knoblock, Byron W. 1939. Bannerstones of the North American Indian. Published by the author, La Grange, Illinois.
- Hodge, Frederick W. (editor). 1907. Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, Part 1. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 30. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. (Entries by W. H. Holmes and G. Fowke.)archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Fowke, Gerard. 1896. Stone Art. In Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 1891-92. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.gutenberg.org (opens in a new tab)
- Fowke, Gerard. 1902. Archaeological History of Ohio: The Mound Builders and Later Indians. Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society, Columbus.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Beauchamp, William M. 1897. Polished Stone Articles Used by the New York Aborigines Before and During European Occupation. Bulletin of the New York State Museum 4(18). Albany.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Jefferies, Richard W. 2008. The Archaic Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: An Update, Vol. 1, edited by David Pollack. Kentucky Heritage Council State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3. Frankfort.archaeology.ky.gov (opens in a new tab)
- USDA Forest Service. n.d. Looking at Prehistory: Indiana's Hoosier National Forest Region, section 3.npshistory.com (opens in a new tab)
- Ontario Archaeological Society. n.d. Summary of Ontario Archaeology.ontarioarchaeology.org (opens in a new tab)
- Mills, William C. 1916. Exploration of the Tremper Mound. In Certain Mounds and Village Sites in Ohio, Vol. 2, Pt. 3. Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society, Columbus.archive.org (opens in a new tab)
- Moorehead, Warren K. 1910. The Stone Age in North America, Vol. 1. Houghton Mifflin, Boston and New York.archive.org (opens in a new tab)